Thursday, December 30, 2010

Business owners want to develop their own "leader"

Wilson is an objective of social and psychological phenomenon, is a person who is willing to accept the effect of psychological factors affecting each other. Any one of the boss, is to establish the credibility of the Act for their own goals. Wilson staff on the boss a heartfelt heartfelt sense of belonging and obedience. This also seems to have a little taste of the spiritual leader, the practice shows that when an organization of Executive leaders and spiritual leader of heavy match, then the organization fighting to get the most out of play. When they are different, the Organization of the ordinary personnel tend to administrative leaders, excellent personnel tend to spiritual leaders.

So how do we measure the prestige of a boss? I believe that following the "force" is the main indicator:

1. appeal

The boss of someone, make order out of the row, cut out the only, a call and 100 should not only accept command staff in occupies more than significant, and high sensitivity of the command.

2, affinity

The boss should be able to become a welcome role, so that employees can take the initiative to close to you, take the initiative to reduce psychological distance, ready to confess to your heart, ready to listen to your words.

3, the impact

Leading language, action, manners, dress, etc., are all to become employees ready to follow suit. In particular, the boss of value orientation, thinking and conduct, and so will the staff have a decisive impact.

4. cohesion

Employees with a sense of belonging of mental cohesion in boss around and receptive to the boss at the core of the organizational structure.

The issue on the authority, the majority of my friends on the prestige of understanding has its biases, here are some common mistakes, you're in the business of must be avoided:

1, to the credibility of the "force" for the misunderstanding of the

This is actually a kind of feudal parental control. Some bosses think Wilson is I said listen, I order you to do, must not violate, accustomed to use power to force staff, even the "cattle do not drink strong press head." If you have a slightly perverse, lightly take punitive measures. This kind of "prestige" will only be apparent, if you want to train your staff the ability to comply, but is a good way.

2, to the "good" as the prestige errors

This and the prestige of "bent" is a kind of the opposite point of view. Some bosses acts as a kind of "golden", not afraid to take the slightest risk of touching staff interests, in order to not sinners of purpose to a certain degree of palliative accommodation. But the good prestige, yes man is never equal to is to do the boss of modern enterprises.

3, take the "thou" prestige errors

A good boss will have its forte, but this is characterised by only may be concentrated in certain aspects. Have a friend who think the boss is a Prestige will everywhere look than employees. In fact, this is unnecessary. Once a factory Director Northeast shop visit, pointed out that a cleaner technology rough, the Trade Union of State has appealed. This factory support, change of clothes, drills up on the lathe, quicker and better. While onlookers satisfation. If so, then what is prestige in action. Or wrong in the factory Director following. Perhaps the Director was pleased that a clap chest statement to: technology is not your strong, I dare to do the Director? this is not a boast, as long as the car clamp rivet welding, as long as anyone in the technology better than me, I'll hand over edge. "The Emperor put Wilson understood as frivolous. This proud but is also extremely confident feeling, it is clear that this King was not on their own as a factory of the nature and existence of the work. It is said, it's a good thing after young workers to compete with the King, the Director knew welding of tongue, did not challenge. This biography in the local business community as a joke.

4, using the "didactic" error for prestige

A friend of references of Confucius "near" is unlikely. He believes that the credibility comes from the sense of distance, a boss should be based on the mystery of the face in front of the staff. This friend has some unknown reason, people are insecure and sense of belonging, which both prestige produce Foundation. In particular, when a boss to mystical and mysterious, to dignity and the dignity that is neither fish nor fowl. Never underestimate the employee's judgment, had to be a no-confidence, the person is a fool, no long-term coexistence.

5, take the "didactic" prestige errors

First, we recognize the soft-spoken expression is an excellent quality of the boss. But as the saying goes chatter, terrible no letter, some boss one-sided opinion on various occasions more speech, speech will establish their own prestige. The say-conversation inevitably become a kind of preaching. Statement was not in, but in the knack, Captivate. Able to express their views in person must first be a let someone willing to speak.

6, take the "wayward" prestige errors

Faults and errors are more likely to win the respect of others. There are a lot of the boss has the tendency of individuals, who knows he was wrong, would not allow staff discussion and opposition. This is a "vanity" psychological mentality, when this kind of vanity rises to the level of bigotry will demonstrate a nervous self-willed. In fact, this surface "just", it is not "just" inside, lack of courage. The famous psychologist Adler said: "from one look at other people's errors can be seen in the way he is generous; while from his own wrong way you can decide whether he is independent and strong. ”

We often say, "able to personally responsible is a qualified person. "And be active on enterprise groups act responsible person will be a good boss, is a leader of the boss.

No comments:

Post a Comment