Leaders from Taiwan leaders how to face the crisis

Taiwan's two political figures from last year until now, have been in crisis management. While they deal with the crisis have also expressed their different styles. The focus of public concern is one of the leaders in the face of stress reactions, what kind of reactions, and what kind of deal is worth learning?

Chen Shui-bian on State machines to charges of consistently do not think you are wrong, and use the "Republican, democratic leader price" to respond; Ma Ying-jeou to past special fees for unused portion of the total donation of $ 15 million, but considered that this part of the integration income and not in the wrong manner. We on their coping styles are not satisfied, where the key?

I think the discussion how to deal with the crisis is not a priority, but why such processing as well as how to improve coping style is important. Because of this and everyone's leadership style, if we are to understand his leadership style, we will be able to predict his reaction, the reaction against this, we can learn to do it would be more consistent with other people or community expectations.

Any person who, in the face of crisis or conflict, the attitude of the following four types: competition, compromise, evade, compromise. Competition is I must win, do not let the other account cheap; compromise is what I do, let you win; escape is not making a decision, the taunts you said, I do not respond to the compromise is yours; step back or take half, not lose not win. These four ways are not qualified coping style.

Qualified treatment method is the first five: a win-win situation. Win-win is to find a mutually satisfactory result, but the results are on both sides is a better and more motivated. All leaders to learn should be a win-win situation, but why do? because everyone's leadership style. Each leader leadership style in the first time in the face of pressure response is different, so he won't be easy once you achieve a win-win situation.

Leadership style and what is the relationship between pressure response, first of all I would like to talk about leadership style type. I will be in charge of the leadership style is divided into four kinds: dominant type, expression, type, type, patience and precision type. Four leading style characteristics are dominant-determination of strong, relatively bright, pay attention to the reaction of accountability and results; expression-and human-interactive, care of others reacted, ideas are diverging, pay attention to the incentive and organizational climate; be patient-there is a sense that care about human relationships with others, attention trust and long-term commitment; precise type quite satisfactory, and keep the rules of the game, pay attention to the equity and efficiency. These four types is a psychologist and organizational behavior home after a long period of empirical generalization of results, not necessarily only one type, but not both at the same time have four.

Secondly, each leadership style to the pressure of reaction and preferences are different. Generally speaking, the dominant type of the response to the charge pressure in favour of competition compared to express the type of comparison in favor of the compromise, patience-compare bias escape accuracy comparison in favour of a compromise.