Meetings of the Chiefs "strokes" for

Strengthen enterprise management, the implementation of democratic decision making is an important way of meeting, the meeting can achieve these goals, still depends on the actual manipulator, which also is nothing secret. In a State-owned enterprises in leadership positions to sit at the head of the country, whether it is called the CEO, President or CEO, anyway, in the habit of forces is "number one", in which the scope will be keeping promise. However, because enterprises are not his own, he had to talk to various meetings of the "have to" deal with. As a responsible Guide, "meeting" was a brainstorming, concentrated all the wisdom of places, but with the benefits of diversity, when top leaders have their own "special" pursuing interests, the meeting would be very difficult to agree with most people, so the specific "meeting" as the procedural aspect of the way. In the face of possible opposition, dictatorial top leaders to put individuals will try to subtly, the collective needs and related meetings wits, Al over the threshold of related conferences. This is a strange top leaders and their presiding game phenomenon, leading the evolution of the "art" is often as ever with the meeting of the "." and We may wish to put the common "tricks", several examples are as follows, to the readers.

Topic "confidential". Conference calling is often the privilege of top leaders, and thus what appears to be convened by the Council or its arbitrariness, can in turn put on the agenda of control tamper pairs that control. Convening the meeting time, the only notification does not inform the issue, the participants would like to find out what the secret will be arrested for "," This allows participants to your meeting role somewhat confused, to chair the meeting of top leaders have little to fear. At the meeting, the top leaders announced that it would be tantamount to announced intention. Because the issues are often too late after we announced serious consideration, a mature view; if it was questioned the level of their understanding is limited, there is a concern only personal views, because they didn't make you consulted beforehand. And the top leaders come prepared, on-the-spot knack, scheduled intention is very easy to become a mature choice was adopted.

Choose the "background". In case of asymmetric information, which enables participants to participate in the meeting was informed or guess, top leaders or topic choice of background materials so that they cannot express the "stand up" in the contend with views. Where a benefit plan is through background material, appropriate to give a good introduction to politicize and even without that intentionally contrasts; otherwise evaded, efforts to cover up. Implied by background, given the premise, lock, small premise of conclusions they are self-evident, participants had to go with the feeling. This time, who then against the top leaders of opinion, it would seem outdated.

Emergency "Government". Top leaders can take advantage of the timing of the meeting, resulting in a plan easily through the atmosphere of the emergency, to possible opposition of "Government". For example, in the quick work, weekend, to surprise, to notify the meeting cannot participate in or do not arrive in time for "citou" can claim that you have no idea, organization can be considered as a waiver. Attendees see the situation so urgent, "late" to see the venue tense, it seems that not many good comments or room for negotiation, on a scheduled programmes also inconvenience criticized had to consent or authorization "number one" decisive and random disposal.