Leadership or management companies?

Our concern is: should lead a business, or management of an enterprise should more art is, or should more scientific? in human activities, there was no need for the right person to lead, but relative to the enterprise operations management, it may also be a central theme. The leader's leadership style is the expression of individual experience, in enterprises operating practice often appear as "Huainan, Huaibei zhizhu orange" this embarrassing situation. Don't you see that someone said in a previous company, and in whom a company finds itself in a dilemma; such examples are not uncommon. Why this is so because the corporate culture and resources conditions. Just like you can please the one or two types of girls, but you are hard to please all the girls. So, in enterprise activities placed too much emphasis on leadership in the manner and methods may not be wise to go to the extreme point, often leads to company politics or something similar.　　While the company is the standardization of corporate politics operations endangers the greatest because the unspoken rules of the place of the rules of the fairplay. Enterprises simply is profitable and sustainable development, while operating enterprises can have a variety of leadership, management, after all, is to become the basis for all its activities, the management platform must be able to learn and can be replicated, and the management of results must be measured objectively (doing business, I thought it may be to the success or failure on Heroes, while the evaluation criteria for success is still to be seriously discussed). If you use inappropriate analogy, I think that down can be said that the leadership is like love, but rather a marriage. Love you more unique is better, but the marriage must comply with national legal requirements and social cultural habits.　　Creative displays of affection are often able to win the hearts of girls; Similarly, the leadership performance of more attractive, the more we can achieve the effect of the leadership. Love can not consider eating, but not in marriage; marriage of business is possible with experience, we know that without love marriage can be in business, and sometimes can operate very well; but at the same time, so much love actually buried in married life in details. Marriage is a subject that is duplicated. Similarly, the enterprise's operations is the objective of reciprocating economic activities, their activities and evaluation are dependent to the external environment of the choices made by it.　　"The fittest survive" is a real cool principles! therefore from this point, I think enterprises operating must be carried out by law – scientific management activities. Of course, a love marriage exists more flexible, you can correct the bad conditions in marriage.　　We certainly hope that love romantic marriage, likewise we also hope that in management activities rendering full leadership personality. In today's business world, we have many excellent business leaders, but we still lack a lot of good corporate management, we strive to cultivate prospects are more of the latter. Because, as professionals, as long as the hard or can achieve, but become eminent persons must have the appropriate opportunity to bring up.　　Our eyes should pay more attention to the regularity of the transactions, instead of legend! The previous array read China University of science and technology, Mr. Liu Zhong-an article that he thinks: formal logic and experimental method is the foundation of Western science and aesthetic logic and experience approach is characteristic of Chinese culture, creative understanding of practice, the dispensable! from here, I can think of our Chinese entrepreneurs and managers are generally more Chinese culture and Western logic and methods will be less.　　At the same time, the Chinese enterprises operating are progressively across regional and national boundaries, and our competitors have also been increasingly internationalized. In this double background, I think we might be overkill for some, more emphasis on Western science, so you can gain oneself cannot. In the moment of China, the leading enterprise seems to be dominated by station prevailed, everyone is talking about the well-known enterprise leaders leadership, and management while also being discussed, but there is a default or praise leaders on management (or system) boundaries of break. This is a cognitive and behavioral aspects of contradictions do not consciously. From the long-term development of enterprises, management-oriented companies because of its stable and reproducible system will be continued in the management of the winners!, or in leadership in managing the leadership? if this is you, how would you focus on?