Enterprise management of seven leading behavioral patterns

Keyword: enterprise management leadership model behavior patterns of enterprise management system management system

Management involves leadership, leadership and leadership qualities, leadership, leadership and performance, etc. Since the inception of management science, many scholars to study the different angle, just leadership model, opinion, offer, emerged in a number of management.

The more famous, have raised the leadership behavior mode continuous distribution field theory of Tan Tenenbaum and Schmidt, design management coordinate system (also known as management grid) of Blake and Morton, have put forward the theory of situational leadership contingent Fidler, useful for more complex variable relationship leading specification model of Frome and meyerton, have established leadership goals-way theory of House and Mitchell, and so on. These people thought and theory, after decades of practice tests, most have been approved by the academic community.

In the management of materials, they are stable reliable local has occupied a space. It is true that they are not on the basic principles of management to make updates and system build on, however, they are leading mode of it success.

Overall, this is a group along the direction of behavioral science pioneer and road management theory is deepening, and close integration with management practice. Their common characteristic is that the creation of a leadership model. Their names have been written into the management development history. This review is to both hidden and opposition but each has his merits of theory: leadership mode continuous distribution field theory and the theory of management coordinates.

From dictatorship to democracy of opposites: the leading model of continuous distribution field theory

Gallant, people leadership often hold a bipolar type concept, black or white, not just the evil, for example, in State institutions, there is a distinction between the sovereign and democratic; in command mode, the difference between forced and appeal; in character types, have a great talent and stupid brutal differences. People's minds the image of the leader, not a black explication is smiling face Maitreya. Even aware of this polarization thinking there is a defect of the wise, no thought to both unified into a single field. The earliest attempt to study between dictatorship and democracy among different leadership links, idea of the gradient with the parameters they're into a system of scholars, Robert Tan Tenenbaum and Warren? Schmidt, they achieved pioneering success. In their writings, from dictatorship to democratic leadership style to draw a picture of the "spectrum", as if light Prism unfolded out of the decompose pattern. This analytic research methods, become later on a model of leadership. Sunshine through the prism of decomposition followed by the bright colors, Tan Tenenbaum and Schmidt's leadership mode continuous distribution field also has seven specific style of leadership.

Robert Tan Tenenbaum (Robert Tannenbaum, 1915-2003) graduated from the University of Chicago, long-term in California University, Professor, leading the development of human resources. His areas of research, the main leading theory, sensitivity training, organizational development, research, etc. Warren? Schmidt (Warren H.Schmidt) is UCLA senior lecturer, he visited more than one school at Washington University, University of Missouri, Springfield College, Union College, University of Southern California, and other schools. Schmidt, versatile, also wrote the screenplay "do the right thing always on?", and in 1970 won the Academy Award.

From 1955 to 1977, Schmidt and Tan Tenenbaum worked in California. The two men on the leadership of the classification and the choice of joint research, in 1958, no. 3-4 month, Harvard Business Review on the how to select the style of leadership "," leadership mode continuous distribution field, "a new concept (it was also called" autocratic-democratic sequential map "). Soon, this outcome was accepted by the management scholars, become a research enterprise and other various organizational leadership issues. In the management literature, referring to the leadership model would have referred to them.

After 15 years of proven, this article received widespread praise, 1973, "how to choose the style of leadership in the Harvard Business Review, June 5-reissued on, its importance and impact. In reissued, Tan Tenenbaum and Schmidt and under the age of development and understanding of, the original theory was added and modified, broke the original theory model of sealing, joined the outside environment factors and the leader and the leader of the interaction between the factors so that their theory was "keeping". Led mode continuous distribution field theory of the background

Before and after the 1960s, the management of the entire system is in the jungle, both complementary and conflicting, interlinked. Leadership model as a branch of management theory, has been spread out new germination and foliage, flower variety. In Tenenbaum and Schmidt, already has a large number of scholars on leading activities conducted numerous studies. Impact of broader but in reality people choose to accept the point of view, mainly has following several.

The leader is the work of the "catalyst" instead of the principal. Organization of specific work is always done by a subordinate to, as in the specific work of first-line employees, their aim is clear, especially for work in the most familiar with. Long-term experience, enabling them to take action when there is a way. Compared with the base staff, leaders are often in the mastery of information and technology proficiency using both. Therefore, grass-roots work specific issues there is no need to ask the leaders for leaders to become familiar with the situation before making decisions. Otherwise, it will cause a waste of time and causes the solution to the problem of inefficient. So, do not do not lead, but emphasized that the essence of leadership is a subordinate of the

Thoughts and feelings to make appropriate reaction to promote men's understanding of the work, improve staff morale.

Leader was widely heard of decision makers. Leader's primary responsibility is the leader in policy making, however, is not a perfect, thanks to the experience, identifiable, professional knowledge, behavior, and other restrictions, a decision will have great risk, often yields. The necessary measures to reduce risk is to seek the views of, especially to hear who hold different positions. An old saying, no story, the former is dark. This is a comprehensive and informed decisions is very necessary. However, it must be clear that leaders should retain the right to the final say, this is the leader of the duty to serve to justify and maintain the leader's authority.

Leaders must make his trust. Decision-making power belongs to the leaders, but do depend on men. Leader in the implementation of the decisions themselves should be used to convince rather than command to eliminate barriers to implementation. Because only inferior understanding and convinced, will be able to perform with high efficiency and high quality decisions. Holding this view, tend to concentrate decision-making power and advocates decentralization of implementation of rights, and stressed that the authority of acceptability. They took the leadership activities largely seen as a kind of "marketing" type of art.

The leader's responsibility is to make decisions, the decision-making authority to others is the leader of dereliction of duty. The reality of such leaders rather common, especially compared to the strong sense of responsibility, or start from the business personally, often in the subconscious to the decentralization of decision-making authority as a dereliction of duty or responsibility. The enterprise into your life and even the lives of leaders.

Leaders should give to complete the task. Starting from the work tasks, people will find that there are many things to accomplish tasks and useless, a large number of meetings and consultations, the majority has no substantive effect. Leader if the bubble in the Lao and reactive power of a transaction, you will get nowhere. So, just execute the decision-making, but also requires leaders to command, set in stone. All unnecessary services in heels and can't resolve leaders are not receive good results.

All these, each view is justified, since a say, and have corresponding theoretical support and verify the facts. However, these ideas are contradictory to each other, a novice would do something for the veteran is. Advocate democracy ' dictatorial leadership style with rebuke, but advocated the centralization, and on the constraints and balance extremely dissatisfied. In reality, people had to "democracy" or "autocratic" comes down to personal preference, leaders or as character and behavior. Once thought to be deep, leaders tend to mess up.

From the truth, they know they should take the initiative of democratization, the leading activities to gain the support of the entire organization and his men, but the leaders of the sense of responsibility and sense of mission, always place them in commanding position, they will feel deep inside than the following employees stand higher, farther. It also led to do? so that their behavior will result in a fragmentation of signs, on the one hand, their subconscious to exercise command, his views to his subordinates; on the other hand, they want to run rules in accordance with the Organization of and conduct scientific theory to guide the conscious guidance staff participation in decision-making.

This is likely to fall into neither like "democracy" and not as "authoritarian" embarrassing situation. Leaders may think he is good to men for advice or opinion leaders, men may feel being Aaron also partial to make this kind of attitude is almost hypocritical. This contradiction treatment is not good, can seriously impact leadership effectiveness.

To this end, Tan Tenenbaum and Schmidt believes that you should study a series of leadership model, but should not just be limited to the dictatorship and democracy both absolute leadership model, select leadership model takes account of which influential factors, taking long-term goals and how to balance the current need. Their leadership of the how to select the mode "in the subtitle," leaders in dealing with his men should be democratic or dictatorial, or somewhere in between? "led mode continuous distribution field theory of the basic content and key issues

Tan Tenenbaum and Schmidt's "leadership mode continuous distribution field" model, the basic idea is to "democracy" and "totalitarian" as the leadership of the two extremes, then put the leader competencies freedom autonomy with the followers of freedom as a gradual increase or decrease of the band, the band can be divided into seven types of behaviour, as in the following figure. In 1958, they were the "boss" and "men" in the glossary. To modify the supplement, 1973, in their view, the "boss" and "followers" meaning with a dependent, do not meet the 1960s civil rights movement in the future due to the impact of organizational changes, therefore, "boss" and "followers" and be completely changed to "managers" and "non-managers".